IPO's Guide

Initial Public Offering Scandal Section


 


Social bookmarking
You like it? Share it!
socialize it

Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter AND receive our exclusive Special Report on Initial-Public-Offering
Email:
First Name:



Main Initial Public Offering Scandal sponsors


 

Latest Initial Public Offering Scandal Link Added

INSERT YOUR OWN BANNER HERE

Submit your link on Initial Public Offering Scandal!



Newest Best Sellers


Welcome to IPO's Guide

 

Initial Public Offering Scandal Article

Thumbnail example. For a permanent link to this article, or to bookmark it for further reading, click here.

An In-Depth Analysis of Initial Public Offering: IPO versus Business Loans

from:


Supposedly you are one of the members of the board of directors of a certain company. The board realized that there is a need for additional capital infusion since the company registers a consistent growth rate in terms of production and marketing aspects. Such growth needs to be addressed in order to avoid later problems that may even result to the mismanagement of the company and possible bankruptcy instead of a progressive corporate output.



There are various suggestions raised by your colleagues. Some suggest that since the company has enough funds, it could be used to finance a business loan that will be used to sustain the company’s growth. Others suggest that the company must go public in order to attract several investors who will infuse the needed capital for the growing operation of the company.



As a member of the board of directors, which way will you pursue? Remember that there are two options that the company can take—first is entering into a loan agreement wherein you need to present any corporate assets as security to the loan. Second, the company could be listed into an IPO or initial public offering, determine the number of shares that the company wants to sell to the public, and the rest will just follow. Both options can raise revenues, yet the question will not just be about generating additional revenues at all.



The question will now be like this: “Which of them provides an advantage to the company and its stakeholders?”



Let us scrutinize the options carefully by going through the first option. The process is simple: once the company found a lending institution that will agree to lend the company with the needed amount, the company through its high executives and officials will enter a contract with a lending company and make an agreement on the conditions prior to the approval of the loan. It will include securing any company assets with equivalent value of the loan against the company and monthly repayments within a specified period of time with applied interest.



The second option will involve the initial sale of the company’s common shares to the public. The company will undergo the IPO process under its governing laws, particularly the Federal Securities Act of 1993 and the governing bodies (such as the Securities and Exchange Commission and the exchange where the common shares of the company are currently listed). Typically, you will spend more or less than $1 million in the whole process, but the initial return of investment is higher than your expenses, since the underwriters (composed of several investment banks) will sell the shares to interested investors higher than its market value.



If you will compare the two options, definitely the initial cost is higher when the company undergoes IPO. The return of investment has yet to be seen after the completion of the process. In other words, you will be spending first before you earned the revenues that you need. It is contrast with securing a loan since you will be able to get the borrowed capital even before you make any repayments. You will be able to use the funds immediately after the released of the approved loan money.



However, the loan will now be on the “negative” side once you will make repayments to the loan that you availed. Remember that once you failed or faltered on the conditions agreed on the loan, the collateral, which is your company’s assets, will be automatically taken away by the lender. In IPO, the assets will not be at risk. Instead, such assets will increase because of additional capital raised through IPO.



The choice between an IPO and a business loan is up to you. Scrutinize the given options and make the right choice.




Other Initial Public Offering Scandal related Articles

Initial Public Offering Costs
Initial Ipo Offering Public
Netscape Initial Public Offering
Initial Public Offering Ipo 20
Google Initial Offering Public

Do you want to contribute to our site : submit your articles HERE


Initial Public Offering Scandal Specific links

Initial Public Offering Scandal News

Why the Media Loves Writing About Facebook's IPO (or Any IPO, Scandal or Lawsuit) - Forbes


Bloomberg (blog)

Why the Media Loves Writing About Facebook's IPO (or Any IPO, Scandal or Lawsuit)
Forbes
The same thing happened to Groupon's IPO. And LinkedIn and basically any IPO. The media rushes to write not only negative, but usually highly speculative or controversial pieces about the company that is about making its lucrative offering. Why?
Facebook's IPO Wasn'ta Huge Hit on Twitter EitherBloomberg (blog)

all 781 news articles »

Read more...


Rupert Murdoch Regretting BSkyB IPO Seen Risking the Rest - BusinessWeek


New York Times

Rupert Murdoch Regretting BSkyB IPO Seen Risking the Rest
BusinessWeek
By Jonathan Browning and Amy Thomson on May 02, 2012 Rupert Murdoch said last week he regretted the 1994 initial public offering of British Sky Broadcasting Group Plc (BSY), which reduced News Corp. (NWSA) (NWSA)'s control. Now its remaining 39 percent ...
Rupert Murdoch Regretting BSkyB IPO Is Seen Risking the RestSan Francisco Chronicle
Today's media stories from the papersThe Guardian

all 5,045 news articles »

Read more...


Rupert Murdoch Regretting BSkyB IPO Now Seen Risking the Rest - Bloomberg


Bloomberg

Rupert Murdoch Regretting BSkyB IPO Now Seen Risking the Rest
Bloomberg
Rupert Murdoch said last week he regretted the 1994 initial public offering of British Sky Broadcasting Group Plc (BSY), which reduced News Corp. (NWSA)'s control. Now its remaining 39 percent holding in the UK's biggest pay-TV company may be slipping ...
Murdoch's Friends Offer Support After UK CondemnationBusinessWeek

all 463 news articles »

Read more...


A hoodie suits Facebook and its CEO - Kansas City Star


Christian Science Monitor

A hoodie suits Facebook and its CEO
Kansas City Star
He wore his hoodie, despite the scandal his casual style caused on Wall Street last week when he met with would-be investors. Even with his social network becoming the biggest tech company IPO ever, he wore a hoodie. Oh, the scandal.
Mark Zuckerberg's IPO challenge: A company that can 'friend' the 99 percentChristian Science Monitor
Take this Facebook IPO and shove itMarketWatch
Facebook Stock Debut Fails to SizzleWCTV
Slate Magazine -TheStreet.com -TechNewsWorld
all 13,908 news articles »

Read more...


Overregulation Shackles Next Facebook - NewsMax.com


OpenMarket.org

Overregulation Shackles Next Facebook
NewsMax.com
By John Berlau Today, Facebook finally goes public with a market capitalization of $104 billion. Its initial public offering (IPO) is the capstone of its amazing ascent that changed the way the world communicates. By contrast, other top American ...
How over-regulation is shackling the next FacebookDaily Caller

all 9 news articles »

Read more...